Linux Kernel Developers: Say No to Closed-source Modules
30 Jun 2008 - 09:02:22

Chris Kanaracus, IDG News Service Mon Jun 23, 2:20 PM ET More than 135 Linux kernel developers have signed a document in protest of vendors that create closed-source code modules for the kernel, calling the practice "harmful and undesirable." The developers' statement stressed that they are speaking for themselves, and not any of their employers. Although the issue of proprietary kernel modules is not new, the matter recently came to a head, according to the developers. "We have just been receiving a constant stream of questions from companies asking how the Linux kernel developers feel about closed-source modules over the past year or so," reads an accompanying FAQ page. "This statement should be the definite answer for how a large majority of them feel with regards to this topic." The site defines modules as bits of code that are often drivers but also serve other functions, such as security. Users and businesses are forced to rely on the module's creator for support instead of the Linux community, and closed modules can also give those users "a very bad perception of how Linux works due to the documented instability of many common closed-source modules," the FAQ states. Vendors should open source their modules because they will be optimized by going through the kernel review process, according to the developers. Help is available for this process, as the Linux Driver Project group will write drivers for vendors at no charge, the site notes. The Linux Found...

Full article

Related news

Linux Developers: It's Time To Open Source All Device Drivers

IDF: Intel Project Aims to Boost Power Efficiency in Linux

Linux Startup Moves Desktop Windows to the Data Center

Mobile Linux Groups Join Forces

Interview: On a mission to silence the doubters

Intel project aims to boost power efficiency in Linux